9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police being scrupulously fair on the offender as well as the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts However they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

The main objectives of police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all guarantee regulation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents in the boy or girl don't approve of this kind of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they can do if they're able to cut off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers this kind of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.

If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may perhaps dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had an opportunity to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner has to pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these an appeal has not but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then seek further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more

a hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight offered to any reported judgment may possibly rely upon the reputation of both the reporter and the judges.[7]

In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there could exist conflicts between the various lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it could be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same sort of case.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.

Federalism also performs a major role in determining the authority of case regulation in the particular court. Indeed, Every circuit has its own list of binding case regulation. Due to this fact, a judgment rendered in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding from the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.

Statutory laws are Those people created by legislative bodies, including Congress at both the federal and state levels. Whilst this style of regulation strives to form our society, furnishing rules and guidelines, it would be extremely hard for just about any legislative body to anticipate all situations and legal issues.

156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is usually important to note that neither seniority nor promotion may be the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion may be claimed or granted without the actual length of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular size of service more info for becoming entitled for being viewed as for promotion to some higher quality, of course, is not without logic as being the officer who is originally inducted to the particular post needs to serve to the stated post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to provide the public within a befitting way.

The acquired Tribunal shall decide the case on merits, without being influenced by the findings inside the Impugned order, after recording of evidence with the respective parties. Read more